{"id":214,"date":"2012-06-26T12:39:23","date_gmt":"2012-06-26T16:39:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.annawahrman.com\/wp\/?p=214"},"modified":"2012-06-26T12:39:23","modified_gmt":"2012-06-26T16:39:23","slug":"gender-inequality-weekly-roundup","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/2012\/06\/gender-inequality-weekly-roundup\/","title":{"rendered":"Gender inequality weekly roundup"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\" http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/newsweek\/2012\/06\/24\/invisible-woman.html\">response by Rachel Sklar on Daily Beast<\/a> to Daily Beast&#8217;s own &#8220;<a href=\" http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/newsweek\/digital-power-index.html\">Digital Power Index<\/a>&#8221; and the sexism therein (just seven women out of 100) really nailed it.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;[The problem] actually pretty simple: Either you think all these industries are dominated across the very top levels by predominantly white men because there are numerous deep-seated societal norms and institutional biases that make it more challenging for women and minorities to advance as quickly and as far as their white male counterparts&#8230;or you think that these lists merely reflect the fact that white dudes must just be better at everything&#8230;. There is no murky middle ground where some of these industries are just more meritocratic and it just so happens that the same patterns that play out across historically gender-biased industries coincidentally bubble up to the surface here too.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think many white men believe that the world is a meritocracy because they are rewarded in all kinds of ways (rightly, they think). Actually, they started the race 100 yards ahead, but they&#8217;re willfully unaware and also somehow still proud when they win.<\/p>\n<p>Sklar name-checks <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/magazine\/archive\/2012\/07\/why-women-still-can-t-have-it-all\/9020\/?single_page=true\">Anne-Marie Slaughter&#8217;s piece in<\/a> <em>The Atlantic<\/em>, which I&#8217;ve also been thinking about since last week. The piece is about why women can&#8217;t have it all. She carefully unpacks tropes like, &#8220;It&#8217;s possible if you are just committed enough,&#8221; &#8220;It&#8217;s possible if you sequence it right&#8221; and &#8220;It&#8217;s possible if you marry the right person.&#8221; In the piece, she discusses family, pressure to be on site in the office and institutional prejudice against working moms. There&#8217;s no real solution floated forward (one of the problems with systemic prejudices is that it&#8217;s hard to solve them!), except maybe changing our agrarian school schedule to better match work schedules. Her conclusion is basically that we should all do what makes us happy.<\/p>\n<p>I thought Rebecca Traister hit a nice volley back to Slaughter in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/2012\/06\/21\/can_modern_women_have_it_all\/singleton\/\">her piece in Salon<\/a> by saying that we should start by never even saying the words &#8220;have it all&#8221; ever again:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;It is a trap, a setup for inevitable feminist short-fall. Irresponsibly conflating liberation with satisfaction, the &#8216;have it all&#8217; formulation sets an impossible bar for female success and then ensures that when women fail to clear it, it\u2019s feminism &#8212; as opposed to persistent gender inequity &#8212; that&#8217;s to blame.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Which brings us back to where we started.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The response by Rachel Sklar on Daily Beast to Daily Beast&#8217;s own &#8220;Digital Power Index&#8221; and the sexism therein (just seven women out of 100) really nailed it. &#8220;[The problem] actually pretty simple: Either you think all these industries are dominated across the very top levels by predominantly white men because there are numerous deep-seated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,4],"tags":[12,26,37,45],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/annawahrman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}